欢迎访问沈阳真空杂志社 Email Alert    RSS服务

真空 ›› 2026, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (4): 97-103.doi: 10.13385/j.cnki.vacuum.2026.04.14

• 真空应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

管腔减压沸腾清洗的动态真空调控机理与传质强化

范媛媛1, 洪爱民2   

  1. 1.安徽省蚌埠市第三人民医院,安徽 蚌埠 233000;
    2.蚌埠医科大学,安徽 蚌埠 233030
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-12 出版日期:2026-07-25 发布日期:2026-07-27
  • 作者简介:范媛媛(1978-),女,安徽省蚌埠市人,本科。

Mechanism and Mass Transfer Enhancement of Dynamic Vacuum Field Regulated Tubular Pressure-Reduction Boiling Cleaning

FAN Yuanyuan1, HONG Aimin2   

  1. 1. The Third People's Hospital of Bengbu City, Bengbu 233000, China;
    2. Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu 233030, China
  • Received:2026-01-12 Online:2026-07-25 Published:2026-07-27

摘要: 恒定真空场用于细长管腔器械清洗时,因流导受限,轴向真空衰减达0.015~0.02 MPa,易引发沸腾传质分布不均问题,管腔末端污染物残留率超25%,制约当前管腔清洗技术的发展。为此,提出并构建主动可编程的动态真空场,依托梯度补偿、速率调控与时序匹配的调控特性,解决传统静态真空场被动适配不足的传质难题。基于四类典型管腔流导差异,建立动态真空参数设计方法,结合多场耦合仿真与实验验证,构建污染物脱附率与传质均匀性量化模型。结果表明,与传统恒定真空方法相比,动态真空场可将管腔全域真空波动控制在0.003 MPa以内,降幅达70%~76%;四类管腔污染物脱附率均突破90%,清洗液流速与体积传质系数分别实现100%~135.7%与33%~35%的提升。所建量化模型拟合优度均超0.9,平均相对误差<4.2%,可为不同规格管腔真空清洗系统的精准设计提供普适性指导工具。

关键词: 动态真空场, 真空梯度补偿, 真空传质强化, 真空沸腾调控

Abstract: When constant vacuum field is used for cleaning slender lumen instruments, the axial vacuum attenuation amplitude reaches 0.015~0.02 MPa due to the influence of conductivity limitation, which causes the uneven distribution of boiling mass transfer and the residual rate of pollutants at the end of lumen exceeds 25%, and restricts the development of current lumen cleaning technology. Therefore, an actively programmable dynamic vacuum field was proposed and established in this study. By utilizing gradient compensation, rate regulation, and temporal matching, this approach effectively resolves the mass transfer limitations arising from the passive adaptation of conventional static vacuum fields. Based on the difference of conductance of four typical cavities, a dynamic vacuum parameter design method was established, and a quantitative model of desorption rate and mass transfer uniformity was constructed by combining multi-field coupling simulation and experimental verification. The results show that, compared with the traditional constant vacuum method, the dynamic vacuum field can control the vacuum fluctuation in the whole cavity to 0.003 MPa, with a decrease of 70%-76%, the desorption rate of four kinds of cavity pollutants exceeds 90%, and the flow rate and volumetric mass transfer coefficient of cleaning solution are increased by 100%-135.7% and 33%-35%, respectively. The goodness-of-fit of the quantitative models were all over 0.9, and the average relative error was less than 4.2%.

Key words: dynamic vacuum field, vacuum gradient compensation, vacuum mass transfer enhancement, vacuum boiling control

中图分类号:  TQ026.5

[1] Łabaj J, Blacha L, Smalcerz A, et al.Removal of arsenic from liquid blister copper during remelting in an induction vacuum furnace[J]. Journal of Mining and Metallurgy, Section B:Metallurgy, 2021, 57(3):371-378.
[2] 陈叔平,汪乘红,成永军,等.毫秒量级快速动态真空校准稀薄气体非定常流动研究[J].真空科学与技术学报,2019,39(8):659-666.
[3] Hu Haowei, Lu Yao, Guo Lin, et al.Effects of system pressure on nucleate boiling:Insights from molecular dynamics[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2024, 402:124745.
[4] 张治华,李晓林,杨嘉,等.抽真空过程中水面蒸发及空气温湿度变化特性研究[J].真空,2025,62(5):1-10.
[5] Jiménez-Robles R, Gabaldón C, Martínez-Soria V, et al.Simultaneous application of vacuum and sweep gas in a polypropylene membrane contactor for the recovery of dissolved methane from water[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 2021, 617:118560.
[6] Kossolapov A, Hughes M T, Phillips B, et al.Bubble departure and sliding in high-pressure flow boiling of water[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2024, 987:A35.
[7] 习振华,李得天,成永军,等.快速动态真空校准装置的研制[J].仪器仪表学报,2019,40(4):43-53.
[8] 李翔,姜小蛟,刘昂,等.面向高精度半导体制程真空环境的热管理研究[J].真空,2025,62(5):11-16.
[9] Shrivastava S K, Shrivastava C.Production, measurement and applications of vacuum systems[J]. Momentum, 2021, 10(3):155-162.
[10] Ma D D, Xia G D, Zong L X, et al.Experimental investigation of flow boiling heat transfer performance in zigzag microchannel heat sink for electronic cooling devices[J]. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 2019, 145:106003.
[11] 王军伟,龚洁,丁文静,等. 基于动网格的空间快速减压过程流场数值模拟与分析[J].真空,2022,59(2):32-37.
[12] 高伟龙,叶芳,郭航,等.核态沸腾气泡动力学参数研究综述[J].煤气与热力,2023,43(9):6-18,33.
[13] Breitenlechner M, Novak G A, Neuman J A, et al.A versatile vacuum ultraviolet ion source for reduced pressure bipolar chemical ionization mass spectrometry[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, 2021,2021:1-17.
[14] Abdizhapparova B, Potapov V, Khanzharov N, et al.Determination of heat transfer mechanisms during vacuum drying of solid-moist and liquid-viscous materials[J]. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2022, 6:120.
[15] 董华军,程靖洲,赵一鉴,等.大电流真空电弧开断过程瞬态特性仿真分析[J].电机与控制学报,2024,28(1):189-196.
[16] 刘三玉. 减压沸腾式超声清洗消毒器在腔镜器械清洗中的应用效果分析[J].名医,2022,(18):51-53.
[17] Sadghiseraji J, Garcia-Vilchez M, Castilla R, et al.Recent advances in numerical simulation of ejector pumps for vacuum generation—A Review[J]. Energies, 2024, 17:4479.
[18] Guo Yong, Zhu Qingqing, Song Shiliang, Et Al.Effects of ultrasound on bubble dynamic behavior of flow boiling in microchannel[J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2024, 111:107099.
[19] 李卓慧,路同山,刘家林,等. 快速减压环境模拟系统中减压时间的近似计算方法[J].真空,2022,59(3):25-28.
[20] 雷丽,郑伟,孙立红,等.基于真空脉动循环参数调控的管腔结构蒸汽穿透机制研究[J].真空, 2025,62(6):47-53.
[21] Wen Tao, Luo Jielin, Jiao Kai, et al.Pool boiling heat transfer enhancement of aqueous solution with quaternary ammonium cationic surfactants on copper surface[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 190:122761.
[22] Walz A, Stoiber K, Huettig A, et al.Navigate flying molecular elephants safely to the ground:mass-selective soft landing up to the Mega-Dalton range by Electrospray Controlled Ion-Beam Deposition[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 2022, 94:7767-7778.
[23] 高文忠,梁建尧,李长松,等. 基于真空沸腾的高热流密度散热过程的试验研究[J]. 真空科学与技术学报, 2016, 36(9):1004-1009.
[24] Schüler F, Keller A, Grebe M, et al.Development of novel lubricant formulation for cleanroom and vacuum application[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15:15407.
[25] Le D, Konsue N.Mass transfer behavior during osmotic dehydration and vacuum impregnation of "Phulae" pineapple and the effects on dried fruit quality[J]. Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal, 2021, 9:308-319.
[26] 杜敏,周宾.气固两相撞击流强化传热传质机理研究[J].热能动力工程,2013,28(05):482-486,551-552.
[27] González-Pérez j e, Jiang S, Jiménez-González O, et al. Implementing topological data analysis for monitoring mass transfer during vacuum-assisted osmotic dehydration of apples[J]. ACS Omega, 2025, 10:30137-30154.
[28] 申莹. 传统手工清洗、含超声的清洗消毒器及减压沸腾清洗机在消毒供应中心腔镜器械清洗中的应用观察[J].临床研究,2024,32(10):89-92.
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 谢元华, 韩 进, 张志军, 徐成海. 真空输送的现状与发展趋势探讨(五)[J]. 真空, 2018, 55(5): 34 -37 .
[2] 孙立志, 闫荣鑫, 李天野, 贾瑞金, 李 征, 孙立臣, 王 勇, 王 健, 张 强. 放样氙气在大型收集室内分布规律研究[J]. 真空, 2018, 55(5): 38 -41 .
[3] 李志胜. 空间环境下超大型红外定标用辐射屏蔽门的研制[J]. 真空, 2018, 55(5): 66 -70 .
[4] 马佳杰, 李建昌, 陈 博. 忆阻器集成应用的研究进展[J]. 真空, 2018, 55(5): 71 -85 .
[5] 刘顺明, 宋 洪, 董海义, 关玉慧, 刘盛画. 四极质谱在漂移管直线加速器上的应用[J]. 真空, 2018, 55(6): 5 -9 .
[6] 申付波, 王 杰, 翟 悦, 周志鹏. 轻型低温吸附床壳体的研究与优化设计[J]. 真空, 2018, 55(6): 42 -44 .
[7] 亚历山德罗·阿巴特科拉. 一种用于粒子加速器的新型高流导离子泵[J]. 真空, 2019, 56(1): 16 -19 .
[8] 仲召进 , 曹 欣 , 高 强 , 韩 娜 , 崔介东 , 石丽芬 , 姚婷婷 , 马立云, 彭 寿. 射频溅射功率对室温沉积 AZO 薄膜性能的影响[J]. 真空, 2019, 56(1): 45 -48 .
[9] 陈文波 , 陈伦江 , 刘川东 , 程昌明 , 童洪辉 , 朱海龙 . 直流电弧等离子体炬的数值模拟研究[J]. 真空, 2019, 56(1): 56 -58 .
[10] 韩 峰 , 张世伟 , 王德喜 , 刘 波 , 王 猛 . 基于真空蒸发的危险工业废水减量化处理技术[J]. 真空, 2019, 56(1): 67 -71 .