欢迎访问沈阳真空杂志社 Email Alert    RSS服务

真空 ›› 2026, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (5): 12-20.doi: 10.13385/j.cnki.vacuum.2026.05.02

• 薄膜 • 上一篇    下一篇

工作气压对HiPIMS放电特性与Cr涂层结构性能影响研究*

田媛媛1, 朱洪波2, 牟清2, 胡天时1, 田修波1,*, 耿慧远1,*, 巩春志1, 张辉1   

  1. 1.哈尔滨工业大学材料结构精密焊接与连接全国重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150001;
    2.重庆长安望江工业集团有限公司,重庆 401133
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-15 出版日期:2026-09-25 发布日期:2026-09-28
  • 通讯作者: 田修波,教授;耿慧远,副教授。
  • 作者简介:田媛媛(2001-),女,山东烟台人,硕士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    *国家自然科学基金资助项目(U2241233.12075071)

Discharge Behavior and Coating Structure-Property Relationship of Cr Target HiPIMS under Low Working Pressure

TIAN Yuanyuan1, ZHU Hongbo2, MU Qing2, HU Tianshi1, TIAN Xiubo1,*, GENG Huiyuan1,*, GONG Chunzhi1, ZHANG Hui1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Precision Welding & Joining for Materials and Structures, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin,150001, China;
    2. Chongqing Chang'an Wangjiang Industrial Group Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401133, China
  • Received:2026-01-15 Online:2026-09-25 Published:2026-09-28

摘要: 为了改善低气压下靶前等离子体的空间分布,揭示工作气压对Cr靶HiPIMS放电与涂层性能的影响规律,本文调整电磁场结构,在靶前引入辅助阳极,成功实现在低工作气压(0.1 Pa)下稳定放电,系统研究了0.1~1.2 Pa范围内工作气压对放电特性以及涂层组织结构和性能的影响规律。采用复合直流高功率电源,保持脉冲电压、脉冲宽度与总功率恒定,分别制备了四组Cr涂层,通过对涂层截面形貌、相结构、表面粗糙度及力学性能进行分析,随着工作气压从1.2 Pa下降到0.1 Pa,脉冲放电过程由气体放电主导向金属放电主导过渡,涂层沉积速率从2.39 μm/h降低到1.53 μm/h。由于气体分子的遮挡效果减弱,等离子体能量提高,入射离子能量提高,导致晶粒尺寸逐渐减小,在0.1 Pa时降低到26.82 nm,同时表面粗糙度从2.45 nm降低到1.27 nm。工作气压的降低可显著影响涂层的界面失效行为,涂层-基体结合力从1.2 Pa时的3.8 N提高到0.1 Pa时的6.8 N,这与真空度升高带来的涂层纯度提高有关。低气压(<0.2 Pa)有利于获得表面更平整、致密且结合力更高的Cr涂层;较高气压(≈1.2 Pa)则获得更高硬度/模量,但粗糙度与界面完整性相对下降。

关键词: 工作气压, 辅助阳极, HiPIMS, Cr涂层, 放电特性

Abstract: This work aims to improve the spatial distribution of plasma in front of the target under low working pressure and to clarify the influence of working pressure on the discharge characteristics and coating properties of Cr target HiPIMS. By adjusting the electromagnetic field configuration and introducing an auxiliary anode in front of the target, stable discharge was successfully achieved at low working pressure of 0.1 Pa. The effects of working pressure in the range of 0.1-1.2 Pa on discharge characteristics, coating microstructure, and properties were systematically investigated. Four groups of Cr coatings were deposited using a composite DC high-power supply while keeping pulse voltage, pulse width, and total power constant. The cross-sectional morphology, phase structure, surface roughness, and mechanical properties of the coatings were analyzed. As the working pressure decreased from 1.2 to 0.1 Pa, the pulse discharge process transitioned from gas-dominated to metal-dominated. The deposition rate decreased from 2.39 to 1.53 μm/h. With the weakening of gas molecular shielding and the increase in plasma energy, higher incident ion energy led to grain refinement, reducing the grain size to 26.82 nm at 0.1 Pa. Meanwhile, the surface roughness decreased from 2.45 to 1.27 nm. Lowering the working pressure also significantly influenced interfacial failure behavior, as the critical load for coating-substrate adhesion (Lc2) increased from 3.8 N at 1.2 Pa to 6.8 N at 0.1 Pa, which is attributed to the higher coating purity under high vacuum. Low working pressure (<0.2 Pa) favors the formation of smoother, denser Cr coatings with stronger adhesion, while higher pressure (≈1.2 Pa) yields coatings with higher hardness and modulus but increased roughness and reduced interfacial integrity.

Key words: working pressure, auxiliary anode, HiPIMS, Cr coating, discharge characteristics

中图分类号:  TB43

[1] 袁满,高宏宇,路敬祎,等.油气管道泄漏检测技术综述[J].吉林大学学报(信息科学版),2022,40(2):159-173.
[2] Kim K, Park M, Lee W, et al.Effects of sputtering power on mechanical properties of Cr films deposited by magnetron sputtering[J]. Materials Science and Technology, 2008, 24(7): 838-842.
[3] D.M. Mattox.Surface effects on the growth, adhesion and properties of reactively deposited hard coatings[J]. Surface & Coatings Technology, 1996, 81(1): 8-16.
[4] Manaud J P, Poulon A, Gomez S, et al.A comparative study of CrN, ZrN, NbN and TaN layers as cobalt diffusion barriers for CVD diamond deposition on WC-Co tools[J]. Surface & Coatings Technology, 2007, 202(2): 222-231.
[5] Santiago J A, Fernández-Martínez I, Sánchez-López J C, et al. Tribomechanical properties of hard Cr-doped DLC coatings deposited by low-frequency HiPIMS[J]. Surface & Coatings Technology, 2020, 382(C):124899.
[6] Sveen S, Andersson J M, M'Saoubi R, et al. Scratch adhesion characteristics of PVD TiAlN deposited on high speed steel, cemented carbide and PCBN substrates[J]. Wear, 2013, 308(1/2): 133-141.
[7] Son S I, Shin D, Son Y G, et al.Effect of working pressure on the properties of RF sputtered SnS thin films and photovoltaic performance of SnS-based solar cells[J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2020, 831(prepublish): 154626.
[8] Huang He, Wang Xuegang, Zhu Xiaodong, et al.Ion-beam assisted magnetron sputtering deposition of titanium nitride films[J]. Rare Metal Materials & Engineering, 2002,31(3):205-208.
[9] Sarakinos K, Alami J, Konstantinidis S.High power pulsed magnetron sputtering: A review on scientific and engineering state of the art[J]. Surface & Coatings Technology, 2010, 204(11): 1661-1684.
[10] 隋金洋,周大雨,赵文瑾,等.工作气压对AlScN薄膜结构和电学性能的影响[J]. 无机材料学报, 2026,41(4):486-492.
[11] 张玉宝,李志刚,王艺,等.工作气压对磁控溅射TaN薄膜微结构和性能的影响[J].材料导报, 2021,35(S2):60-63.
[12] 吴忠振,田修波,潘锋,等.不同靶材料的高功率脉冲磁控溅射放电行为[J].金属学报,2014,50(10): 1279-1284.
[13] Musil J.Low-pressure magnetron sputtering[J]. Vacuum, 1998, 50(3/4): 363-372.
[14] 丁啸云. 物理气相沉积Cr/Ta基身管用防护涂层制备及结构性能研究[D]. 北京:北京科技大学,2025.
[15] 倪炜臣. 放电气压对金属靶射频、甚高频磁控溅射离子性能的影响[D]. 苏州:苏州大学,2022.
[16] 吴忠振,田修波,李春伟,等.高功率脉冲磁控溅射的阶段性放电特征[J].物理学报,2014,63(17):204-212.
[17] 胡明. 不同制备方法的火炮身管材料Cr涂层性能研究[D]. 太原:中北大学, 2019.
[18] 王子嘉,李宇鑫,胡天时,等.外加辅助阳极的高功率脉冲磁控溅射管内Cr涂层制备及其性能分析[J]. 中国表面工程,2025,38(1):99-106.
[19] Xiao Xun, Zuo Jiadong, Wang Yaqiang, et al.Tuning the microstructure and mechanical properties in nanocrystalline Cr coatings by sputtering power[J]. Materials Science & Engineering A, 2022, 844:143204.
[20] 李显. 磁控管非平衡度及偏压对Cr涂层生长和组织性能的影响研究[D].西安:西安理工大学,2009.
[21] Pyykkö P, Atsumi M.Molecular double-bond covalent radii for elements Li-E112[J]. Chemistry:A European Journal, 2009, 15(46):12770-12779.
[22] 程玺儒. 非平衡磁控溅射离子镀制备TiAlN薄膜及其性能研究[D].成都:西华大学,2017.
[23] 邢晓帅,刘影夏,于晓东,等.溅射功率和气压对直流磁控溅射制备钨薄膜的影响[J].稀有金属材料与工程,2022,51(2): 682-688.
[24] 张文,邱长军,曾小安,等.表面镀Cr膜锆合金的抗高温氧化性能研究[J].稀有金属与硬质合金,2017,45(6): 71-75.
[25] Kelly P J, Arnell R D.The influence of magnetron configuration on ion current density and deposition rate in a dual unbalanced magnetron sputtering system[J]. Surface and Coatings Technology, 1998,(108/109):317-322.
[26] 罗渝然. 化学键能数据手册[M].北京:科学出版社,2005.
[27] 陈瑞芳,倪泽炎,花银群,等.磁控溅射参数及基片材料对铜薄膜结合强度的影响[J].热加工工艺, 2013, 42(24):66-69,72.
[28] 钟利,陈美艳,刘旋,等.基底偏压调控超薄PI薄膜表面铜涂层的结构和性能[J].原子能科学技术, 2025, 59(S2):534-542.
[29] 徐全国,张健,宗世强.溅射气压对铜基复合薄膜结合性能的影响[J].辽宁化工,2024,53(7):1005-1007, 1011.
[1] 刘锦涛, 朱洪波, 牟清, 胡天时, 田修波, 巩春志, 耿慧远, 王子嘉. 沉积温度对管内高功率脉冲磁控溅射制备Cr涂层性能影响*[J]. 真空, 2026, 63(2): 13-21.
[2] 罗军文, 李志方. 印制电路板清洁化镀膜生产线的研制[J]. 真空, 2023, 60(2): 26-29.
[3] 张玉琛, 张海宝, 陈强. 高功率脉冲磁控溅射制备ZnO薄膜的研究进展*[J]. 真空, 2021, 58(1): 72-77.
[4] 岳玲, 石月娟, 马玉山, 刘海波, 周永兴, 张明明, 巩春志, 田修波. 内径20mm导向套筒内壁处理(1):空心阴极氩气放电特性研究*[J]. 真空, 2020, 57(2): 53-57.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李民久, 熊 涛, 姜亚南, 贺岩斌, 陈庆川. 基于双管正激式变换器的金属表面去毛刺 20kV 高压脉冲电源[J]. 真空, 2018, 55(5): 19 -24 .
[2] 刘燕文, 孟宪展, 田 宏, 李 芬, 石文奇, 朱 虹, 谷 兵, 王小霞 . 空间行波管极高真空的获得与测量[J]. 真空, 2018, 55(5): 25 -28 .
[3] 黄 思 , 王学谦 , 莫宇石 , 张展发 , 应 冰 . 液环压缩机性能相似定律的实验研究[J]. 真空, 2018, 55(5): 42 -45 .
[4] 韦 俊 , 刘志宏 , 李 波 , 陈晓莉 . 大口径氧化铝陶瓷与不锈钢材料的封接及其真空检漏[J]. 真空, 2018, 55(5): 62 -65 .
[5] 赵彦辉, 史文博, 刘忠海, 刘占奇, 于宝海. 电弧离子镀沉积工艺参数的影响[J]. 真空, 2018, 55(6): 49 -59 .
[6] 张粉利, 邓敬莲, 王杰峰, 孟庆远. 钢管镀膜前处理清洗工艺的研究[J]. 真空, 2018, 55(6): 60 -63 .
[7] 段永利, 邓文宇, 齐丽君, 刘 坤, 孙宝玉, 王 庆. 金属 Tb 晶界扩散对烧结钕铁硼磁性和耐温性的影响[J]. 真空, 2018, 55(6): 76 -79 .
[8] 徐均琪 , 李候俊 , 李 绵 , 王 建 , 苏俊宏 , 基玛·格拉索夫 . 热蒸发沉积 TiO2 薄膜的光学及激光损伤特性[J]. 真空, 2019, 56(1): 39 -44 .
[9] 王春明, 张明达, 苏玉萍. 真空应用设备检漏方法的探讨[J]. 真空, 2019, 56(1): 52 -55 .
[10] 朱 磊, 李 晶. 真空气淬炉炉膛污染的危害和预防措施[J]. 真空, 2019, 56(1): 59 -62 .