欢迎访问沈阳真空杂志社 Email Alert    RSS服务

VACUUM ›› 2026, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (1): 103-108.doi: 10.13385/j.cnki.vacuum.2026.01.16

• Vacuum Technology Application • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Numerical Simulation of Excavation Stability of Deep Foundation Pit with Vacuum Negative Pressure Pile Anchor Support Under Complex Foundation Conditions

HU Bibo, TIAN Zhanfei, LI Shaochen, SHANG Enming, WANG Yao   

  1. China Construction Seventh Engineering Division Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450001, China
  • Received:2024-11-07 Online:2026-01-25 Published:2026-02-02

Abstract: Complex foundation includes conditions such as weak layer, karst area and variable geological structure. This type of foundation has problems such as heterogeneity of geological structure, uncertainty of stratum change and high groundwater level. As the key technology of deep foundation pit excavation, the stability of pile-anchor support plays a decisive role in engineering safety. To ensure the safety of deep foundation pit excavation, it is of great significance to study the numerical simulation method for the stability of deep foundation pit excavation under complex foundation conditions. Taking the deep foundation pit excavation project in a city commercial complex project as a research case, and based on the analysis of the geological conditions and soil characteristics of the deep foundation pit, the three-pile anchor support scheme and the corresponding application parameters are determined. Combined with the vacuum well point dewatering method, the vacuum pump is used to form a negative pressure in the well point tube to reduce the groundwater level. By improving the soil parameters of Mohr-Coulomb constitutive model, the element simulation properties of each structure of pile-anchor support are defined. Taking ten groups of working conditions as the boundary conditions of numerical simulation, the relevant numerical simulation under complex foundation conditions is completed. The results show that the change rate of pile top horizontal displacement is fast during excavation, and the horizontal displacement of pile top gradually increases with the advance of working conditions, but the horizontal displacement after stability is within the warning value. The soil excavation method of pile-anchor support has little influence on the surrounding strata, and the maximum settlement displacement value is also within the warning value, which has a certain stable excavation effect.

Key words: complex foundation, pile anchor support construction, vacuum well point dewatering method, earth excavation, numerical simulation

CLC Number:  TU473

[1] 陶志刚,谢迪,隋麒儒,等. 复杂地质条件下隧道围岩大变形负泊松比锚索主动支护方法及控制效果研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024,43(2):275-286.
[2] 辛思远,楼百根,张寿红,等. 分布集中式真空卸污系统研制及高原铁路站(所)应用探析[J]. 青海科技, 2022,29(6):166-172.
[3] 林鸣,裴岷山,刘晓东,等. 港珠澳大桥岛隧工程建造技术[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版),2023,53(6):955-964.
[4] 舒晓云,田洪铭,陈卫忠,等. 不同水平应力条件下层状软岩隧道开挖变形破坏模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2023,42(增刊2):4204-4215.
[5] 张广辉. 复杂地质地下洞室开挖支护技术研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2023,45(增刊1):129-130.
[6] 刘根. 复杂地质条件下深基坑支护结构动态可靠度研究[J]. 建筑技术, 2023,54(11):1297-1301.
[7] 陶志刚,杜志锋,刘凇源,等. NPR锚索支护下相交隧道围岩变形规律及破坏机理[J]. 煤炭学报, 2023,48(增刊2):473-484.
[8] 曾伟伟. 复杂构造区穿层巷道支护参数设计[J]. 煤炭技术, 2023,42(2):107-111.
[9] 连保康,马凯伦. 空间受限条件下多风险源的深基坑施工案例研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022,59(增刊1):1095-1101.
[10] 窦凤金. 薄基岩强风化厚松散层下巷道掘进与支护技术[J]. 煤炭技术, 2022,41(10):62-66.
[11] 伊钟玉. 复合强力墩柱在工作面过复杂地质条件大断面空巷中的应用[J]. 煤炭技术, 2022,41(10):244-247.
[12] 廖原,乔绍财,黄海荣,等. 某超高层深基坑支护设计及智能监测技术的应用[J]. 桂林理工大学学报, 2023,43(1):100-107.
[13] 于占强,毛金旺,梁宁慧,等. 复杂地质病害隧道衬砌拆除塌方机理及处治措施[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022,18(3):997-1005.
[14] 李桂臣,杨森,孙元田,等. 复杂条件下巷道围岩控制技术研究进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2022,50(6):29-45.
[15] 吴小虎,呼书杰,孙恩泽,等.面向大空间建筑的氟化非晶碳薄膜性能调控方法研究[J]. 真空,2023,60(6):42-46.
[16] 何钦,陈大江,张记峰,等. 基坑支护结构深层水平位移线型及危险点的判定[J]. 工业建筑, 2022,52(2):96-100.
[17] 沙成满,杨慧敏,王星.深基坑桩锚支护中横梁及粘滞效应的影响分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2023, 19(4):1270-1280.
[18] 马泽宁,沙成满,路明浩.基于混合果蝇算法的桩锚支护深基坑临界滑面搜索[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2024,45(1):120-128.
[19] 张超翔,张志强.深基坑桩锚支护结构位移分析及数值模拟[J]. 科学技术与工程,2022,22(18):8022-8029.
[20] 曹程明,时轶磊,龙照,等.偏压条件下排桩加内支撑支护深基坑受力与变形分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023,23(7):2952-2959.
[21] 谭鑫,金永乐,黄明华,等.桩锚支护基坑对近邻建筑影响实测及三维数值分析[J]. 土木工程学报,2023,56(7):126-136.
[22] 王俊鹏,钟伟慈,张裕,等.富水砂层深基坑支护结构模拟分析与优化[J]. 建筑技术, 2024,55(2):134-139.
[23] YIN X P,NI H M.Displacement analysis and numerical simulation of pile-anchor retaining structure in deep foundation pit[J]. Journal of Measurements in Engineering,2024,12(1):124-137.
[24] HAN L J,ZHANG S H,TANG H R.Force calculation of mechanical model of pile-anchored support structure based on elastic foundation beam method[J]. European Journal of Computational Mechanics,2023,32(2):183-210.
[25] 周勇,赵元基,王正振,等.基于位移梯度法的深基坑桩锚支护结构动态稳定性分析[J]. 兰州理工大学学报,2022,48(6):110-119.
[26] 酆纲,孟政,杨学东,等.固态全无机电致变色玻璃窗透过率与遮蔽系数测试与分析[J]. 真空,2023,60(1):13-16.
[27] 谢晟,韦巡洲.桩撑与桩锚联合支护体系在复杂地层深基坑的应用[J]. 土木工程与管理学报,2022,39(5):63-69.
[1] FAN Lanlan, QIU Junjie. Simulation Design Study of New MPCVD Resonant Cavity Device [J]. VACUUM, 2025, 62(6): 9-15.
[2] ZHOU Mingxu, LI Jianchang. Effect of Graphite-Plate Thickness on the Temperature Field in Silicon Carbide Vacuum Sintering Furnace [J]. VACUUM, 2025, 62(4): 49-53.
[3] SONG Xin, GUO Jian-zhang. Research on the Pumping Performance of a Multi-stage Series Nozzle Liquid-gas Jet Pump Based on Fluent [J]. VACUUM, 2024, 61(3): 40-45.
[4] YU Da-yang, WU Gai. Numerical Simulation of the Influence of Gas Distribution and Film Deposition Process in MOCVD Reactor with Large-sized Square Carrier [J]. VACUUM, 2024, 61(2): 22-28.
[5] HE Tian-yi, YUE Xiang-ji, ZHANG Zhi-jun, BA De-chun, FENG Xiao-rong, YANG Fan. Numerical Simulation of Gas Flow in a Fixed Pitch Screw Vacuum Pump [J]. VACUUM, 2024, 61(1): 52-57.
[6] XING Yin-long, WU Jie-feng, PEI Shi-lun, LIU Zhi-hong, LI Bo, LIU Zhen-fei, MA Jian-guo. Study on the Forming Technology of Boat-shaped High Frequency Cavity Shell [J]. VACUUM, 2023, 60(6): 78-83.
[7] LI Ping-chuan, XU Li, ZHAO Jie, ZHANG Fan, XIONG Si-wei, JIAN Yi, ZHANG Zheng-hao, TANG De-li. Numerical Simulation and Experimental Research on Miniaturized Anode Layer Thruster [J]. VACUUM, 2023, 60(4): 36-41.
[8] WANG Gui-peng, HUANG Yu-xing, QU Shao-fen, GAO Guang-wei, XIE Yuan-hua, LIU Kun, BA De-chun. Study on Influence of the Change of Inlet and Outlet Angle of Impeller Blade of Vacuum Heat Treatment Furnace on Cooling Efficiency [J]. VACUUM, 2022, 59(5): 63-68.
[9] FANG Ming-yuan, WU Yue, ZHANG Yang, XU Zhong-xu. Simulation on Thermal Comfort of Astronaut Wearing Space Suit Under the Condition of Cabin Pressure Loss [J]. VACUUM, 2022, 59(4): 80-85.
[10] LIU Sheng, CUI Yu-hao, DOU Ren-chao, SHI Li-xia, SUN Li-chen, REN Guo-hua, YAN Rong-xin. Numerical Simulation on Internal Pressure Variation of Test Specimens During Vacuum Test [J]. VACUUM, 2022, 59(3): 12-15.
[11] WANG Jun-wei, GONG Jie, DING Wen-jing, XU Jing-hao, GU Miao, ZHANG Li-ming. Numerical Simulation and Analysis of Spatial Rapid Decompression Process Based on Dynamic Grid [J]. VACUUM, 2022, 59(2): 32-37.
[12] LI Cheng-ming, SU Ning, LI Lin, YAO Wei-zhen, YANG Shao-yan. Flow Field Analysis and Large-Scale Material Growth in a Vertical Graded Varying Velocity Hydride Vapor Phase Epitaxy(HVPE) Reactor [J]. VACUUM, 2021, 58(2): 1-5.
[13] ZHU Zhi-peng, QIN Bin-wei, ZHANG Ying-li, YUE Xiang-ji, BA De-chun. Experimental Study on Particle Image Velocimetry of Rarefied Gas Flow [J]. VACUUM, 2021, 58(1): 38-44.
[14] KONG Yuan, ZHANG Hai-ou, GAO Jian-cheng, CHEN Xi, WANG Gui-lan. Numerical Simulation of Multi-Scale Double Time Steps Multi-Physical Fields During Laser Metal Melting Deposition Process [J]. VACUUM, 2020, 57(4): 77-84.
[15] ZHAO Jie, XV Li, LI Jian, WANG Kun, WANG Shi-qing. Numerical Simulation and Analysis of Discharge Plasma in Hall Thruster [J]. VACUUM, 2020, 57(4): 54-59.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] LI Min-jiu, XIONG Tao, JIANG Ya-lan, HE Yan-bin, CHEN Qing-chuan. 20kV high voltage based on double transistor forward converter pulse power supply for metal deburring[J]. VACUUM, 2018, 55(5): 19 -24 .
[2] LIU Yan-wen, MENG Xian-zhan, TIAN Hong, LI Fen, SHI Wen-qi, ZHU Hong, GU Bing. Test of ultra high vacuum in space traveling-wave tube[J]. VACUUM, 2018, 55(5): 25 -28 .
[3] HUANG Si, WANG Xue-qian, MO Yu-shi, ZHANG Zhan-fa, YING Bing. Experimental study on similarity law of liquid ring compressor performances[J]. VACUUM, 2018, 55(5): 42 -45 .
[4] WEI Jun、, LIU Zhi-hong, LI Bo, CHEN Xiao-li. Brazing and vacuum leak detection of large caliber alumina ceramic and stainless steel[J]. VACUUM, 2018, 55(5): 62 -65 .
[5] ZHAO Yan-hui, SHI Wen-bo, LIU Zhong-hai, LIU Zhan-qi, YU Bao-hai. Effect of deposition process parameters on arc ion plating[J]. VACUUM, 2018, 55(6): 49 -59 .
[6] ZHANG Fen-li, DENG Jing-lian, WANG Jie-feng, MENG Qing-yuan. Study on the pretreatment cleaning process of steel tube before coating[J]. VACUUM, 2018, 55(6): 60 -63 .
[7] DUAN Yong-li, Deng Wen-yu, QI Li-jun, LIU Kun, SUN Bao-yu, WANG Qing. Influence of Tb grain boundary diffusion on the magnetic performance and heat resistance of sintered NdFeB magnet[J]. VACUUM, 2018, 55(6): 76 -79 .
[8] XU Jun-qi, LI Hou-jun, LI Mian, WANG Jian, SU Jun-hong, GOLOSOV Dmitriy A.. Optical and laser damage characteristics of TiO2 films prepared by thermal evaporation deposition technique[J]. VACUUM, 2019, 56(1): 39 -44 .
[9] WANG Chun-ming, ZHANG Ming-da, SU Yu-ping. Discussion on leak detection method of vacuum application equipment[J]. VACUUM, 2019, 56(1): 52 -55 .
[10] ZHU Lei, LI Jing. Harm and prevent measures for chamber pollution of gas quenching furnace[J]. VACUUM, 2019, 56(1): 59 -62 .